Dr. Praful Nandankar, Dr. Prashantkumar V. Dhawas. AI-Assisted performance evaluation and health monitoring of PEM fuel cells: an experimental study of component-level aging, LSTM-based degradation forecasting and random forest fault diagnosis[J]. Energy Lab, 2026, 4(1): 260105. doi: 10.54227/elab.20260105
Citation: Dr. Praful Nandankar, Dr. Prashantkumar V. Dhawas. AI-Assisted performance evaluation and health monitoring of PEM fuel cells: an experimental study of component-level aging, LSTM-based degradation forecasting and random forest fault diagnosis[J]. Energy Lab, 2026, 4(1): 260105. doi: 10.54227/elab.20260105

RESEARCH ARTICLE

AI-Assisted performance evaluation and health monitoring of PEM fuel cells: an experimental study of component-level aging, LSTM-based degradation forecasting and random forest fault diagnosis

More Information
  • Corresponding author: pppful@gmail.com
  • Proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are at the core of clean hydrogen energy systems, but their long-term operation is constrained by coupled ageing of the membrane-electrode assembly and operational faults such as flooding, membrane drying, fuel starvation, and catalyst-layer degradation. This paper presents an experimental and data-driven study of PEMFC stack behaviour during 1500 hours of continuous operation using two complementary artificial-intelligence models: a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for voltage-degradation forecasting and remaining-useful-life (RUL) estimation, and a Random Forest (RF) classifier for fault diagnosis. Polarization and power-density characteristics were measured at 0 h, 500 h, 1000 h and 1500 h, while six operating parameters—cell voltage, stack temperature, relative humidity, pressure drop, current ripple and charge-transfer resistance—were recorded for fault-signature extraction. The revised analysis explicitly relates the observed stack-level degradation to the ageing pathways of the carbon paper, membrane, catalyst and ionomer and discusses their cumulative effects. A component-screening database was organized by mapping each key component and ageing mechanism to measurable sensor signatures and AI-learning variables; direct component-level chemical or microscopic measurements were not part of the present experiment and are therefore treated as a limitation rather than as synthetic data. The LSTM model predicted the voltage-degradation trajectory with RMSE of 6.85 mV, MAE of 4.51 mV and R2 of 0.970 and predicted RUL with R2 of 0.960. The RF classifier achieved 97.3% accuracy, 97.4% macro-precision, 97.3% macro-recall and 97.3% F1-score on five operating-condition classes. Results demonstrate that combining component-aware degradation interpretation with sequence-learning prognostics and ensemble fault classification provides a practical health-monitoring framework for PEMFC systems.


  • 加载中
  • 1. J. Larminie and A. Dicks, Fuel Cell Systems Explained, 2nd ed. , Wiley, USA, 2003.
    2. Y. Wang, K. S. Chen, J. Mishler, S. C. Cho, X. C, Adroher, Appl. Energy, 2011, 88, 981
    3. A. Nagila, S. Mg, F. D. Deepak, R. Kumar, P. V. Nandankar, Proc. Int. Conf. Edge Comput. Appl., 2022, 1, 711
    4. Chandramma, P. Prakash, P. Nandankar, H. Roopa, I. Kathir and P. Singh, AIP Conf. Proc., 2023, 2690, 020047.
    5. H. Xu, L. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Qiu, H. Zhou, H. Su, IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. , 2026, Early Access.
    6. Z. Hua, Z. Zheng, E. Pahon, M. C. Marion-Péra. D. Hissel, Energy Convers. Manage., 2021, 231, 113825
    7. Z. Zheng, R. Petrone, M. C. Pera, M. Hissel, C. Becherif, H. Pianese, N. Yousfi-Steiner, M. Sorrentino, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 8914
    8. R. Petrone, Z. Zheng, D. Hissel, M. C. Pera, C. Pianese, M. Sorrentino, M. Becherif, N. Yousfi-Steiner, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 7077
    9. K. Chen, S. Laghrouche, A. Djerdir, M. El Bagdouri, A. El Moudni, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44, 1930
    10. C. Zhang, S. Zhao, X. Yang, Y. Zhang, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2021, 36, 41.
    11. M. A. R. S. Khan, S. Al-Dahidi, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2022, 167, 112742
    12. P. Archana, P. Divyabharathi, S. R. Balaji, N. Kumareshan, P. Veeramanikandan, S. T. Naitik, S. M. Rafi, P. V. Nandankar, G. Manikandan, Measurement: Sensors, 2022, 24, 100575
    13. Y. Cheng, H. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Power Sources, 2021, 482, 228960.
    14. B. Dwarakanath, G. Shrivastava, R. Bansal, P. Nandankar, V. Talukdar, M. A. Usmani, Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur., 2023, 14, 342.
    15. P. Nandankar, M. V. Aware, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron. , Drives Energy Syst. (PEDES), IEEE, India, 2012.
    16. A. T. Jambhulkar, A. M. Bhoyar, C. M. Shivankar, P. S. Balwad and P. Nandankar, Int. J. Innovations Eng. Sci., 2023, 8, 1.
    17. Q. Li, H. Wang, T. Wang, X. Li, Y. Liu, W. Chen, Z. You, IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., 2025, 11, 2707
  • This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(6)

Tables(2)

Information

Article Metrics

Article views(109) PDF downloads(61) Citation(0)

Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint