Ruthenium-based metal oxide for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: advances and challenges

Pengbo Wang; Yibo Wang; Zhaoping Shi; Hongxiang Wu; Jiahao Yang; Jing Ni; Junjie Ge; Changpeng Liu; Wei Xing

doi:10.54227/elab.20220018

Article navigation > Energy Lab > 2023 > 1, 220018

Pengbo Wang, Yibo Wang, Zhaoping Shi, Hongxiang Wu, Jiahao Yang, Jing Ni, Junjie Ge, Changpeng Liu, Wei Xing. Ruthenium-based metal oxide for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: advances and challenges[J]. Energy Lab, 2023, 1(3): 220018. doi: 10.54227/elab.20220018

Citation:

Pengbo Wang, Yibo Wang, Zhaoping Shi, Hongxiang Wu, Jiahao Yang, Jing Ni, Junjie Ge, Changpeng Liu, Wei Xing. Ruthenium-based metal oxide for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: advances and challenges[J]. Energy Lab, 2023, 1(3): 220018. doi: 10.54227/elab.20220018

REVIEW ARTICLE

Ruthenium-based metal oxide for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: advances and challenges

More Information

1.
Laboratory of Advanced Power Sources, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
2.
School of Applied Chemistry and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
3.
Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Chemical Power Sources, Changchun 130022, China
4.
State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
Corresponding authors: gejunjie@ustc.edu.cn; liuchp@ciac.ac.cn; xingwei@ciac.ac.cn

§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Abstract

Utilizing proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWE) to produce hydrogen is a promising way to provide clean energy, reduce carbon emissions and improve the utilization rate of renewable energy. The slow kinetics of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode is considered to be the crucial obstacle to its conversion efficiency. Due to the strong acidic and oxidizing environment of OER reaction, it is essential to develop electrocatalyst with high activity and high stability to reduce the high kinetic barrier of OER and improve the reaction rate. Among them, Ru-based catalysts have outstanding catalytic activity and relatively low price, which has aroused great interest in its practical application. Many Ru-based catalysts with superior performance have been developed in recent years. In this review, we mainly focus on the development of Ru-based catalysts towards OER, with OER mechanisms discussed first, followed by discussion in the factors affecting the catalytic performance, and then introduce current research progress of Ru-based catalysts under acidic conditions. We finally conclude the prospect of the development direction of Ru-based catalysts in the future, hopefully guiding further development of Ru-based catalysts towards real world operation.
- Ru-based metal oxide /
- Oxygen Evolution Reaction /
- Acidic Medium
Information

Received Date: 22 December 2022

Accepted Date: 31 January 2023

Available Online: 19 May 2023

Publish Date: 23 February 2024

FullText(HTML)

Author Biographies

Author Biographies

Pengbo Wang received his BS from Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China, in 2021. Currently, he is a master student at Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. under the supervision of Professor Changpeng Liu. Now his research focuses on water electrolysis technology and its microscopic reaction mechanism.

Yibo Wang received his BS from Zhengzhou University, China, in 2018. Currently, he is an MA candidate in Physical Chemistry under the supervision of Prof. Wei Xing at the Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Now his research focuses on water electrolysis technology and its microscopic reaction mechanism.

Junjie Ge received her Ph.D. in physical chemistry from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2010. She worked at the University of South Carolina and Hawaii Natural Energy Institute as a postdoc and joined Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry in March 2015 as a full professor. Her research interests include fuel cells, nanoscience, catalysis, and electrochemistry. She has published over 30 peer-reviewed papers and several posters, abstracts and presentations. She is also acting as a referee for several top journals in the field related to catalysis, electro-chemistry, and fuel cells.

Changpeng Liu received his Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry in 2002 and was appointed as a professor at the Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry in 2012. He has been in charge of and taken part in several relevant fuel cell projects (e.g. 863 programs and 973 programs China). Liu’s research focuses on the technology and performance of catalysts, electrode MEA and stacks.

Wei Xing is currently director of the Laboratory of Advanced Power Sources in Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry (CIAC). After receiving his Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry, at CIAC in 1995, he worked at the Hong Kong Productivity Council (HKPC), researching the electrochemical treatment of metal surfaces. In 2001, he joined CIAC as a professor and devoted his work to development of advanced chemical power sources. He has published over 150 papers in peer-reviewed journals and has applied for over 30 patents. His research areas currently involve proton exchange membrane fuel cells from fundamental electro-catalytic processes to relevant fuel cell assembly and testing.

References

1.	B. Hui, H. Chen, C. Zhou, L. Cai, K. Zhang, F. Quan and D. Yang, Biochar, 2022, 4, 39 CrossRef Google Scholar
2.	J. He, X. Zhou, P. Xu and J. Sun, Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11, 2102883 CrossRef Google Scholar
3.	S. B. Scott, R. R. Rao, C. Moon, J. E. Sørensen, J. Kibsgaard, Y. Shao-Horn and I. Chorkendorff, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 1977 CrossRef Google Scholar
4.	S. B. Scott, J. E. Sørensen, R. R. Rao, C. Moon, J. Kibsgaard, Y. Shao-Horn and I. Chorkendorff, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 1988 CrossRef Google Scholar
5.	Z. W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C. F. Dickens, I. Chorkendorff, J. K. Nørskov and T. F. Jaramillo, Science, 2017, 355, 146 CrossRef Google Scholar
6.	S. Hao, H. Sheng, M. Liu, J. Huang, G. Zheng, F. Zhang, X. Liu, Z. Su, J. Hu, Y. Qian, L. Zhou, Y. He, B. Song, L. Lei, X. Zhang and S. Jin, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2021, 16, 1371 CrossRef Google Scholar
7.	Y. Liu, C. Xiao, P. Huang, M. Cheng and Y. Xie, Chem, 2018, 4, 1263 CrossRef Google Scholar
8.	J. Ni, Z. P. Shi. X. Wang, Y. B. Wang, H. X. Wu, C. P. Liu, J. J. Ge, W. Xing, J. Electrochem, 2022, 28, 2214010 CrossRef Google Scholar
9.	N. Zhang, C. Wang, J. Chen, C. Hu, J. Ma, X. Deng, B. Qiu, L. Cai, Y. Xiong and Y. Chai, ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 8537 CrossRef Google Scholar
10.	V. H. Hoa, D. T. Tran, S. Prabhakaran, D. H. Kim, N. Hameed, H. Wang, N. H. Kim and J. H. Lee, Nano Energy, 2021, 88, 106277 CrossRef Google Scholar
11.	Q. Yao, B. Huang, Y. Xu, L. Li, Q. Shao and X. Huang, Nano Energy, 2021, 84, 105909 CrossRef Google Scholar
12.	C. Wang, L. Jin, H. Shang, H. Xu, Y. Shiraishi and Y. Du, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 2108 CrossRef Google Scholar
13.	L. Gao, X. Zhong, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Liu and B. Zhang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, CrossRef Google Scholar
14.	Y. Deng, L. Yang, Y. Wang, L. Zeng, J. Yu, B. Chen, X. Zhang and W. Zhou, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 511 CrossRef Google Scholar
15.	F.-Y. Chen, Z.-Y. Wu, Z. Adler and H. Wang, Joule, 2021, 5, 1704 CrossRef Google Scholar
16.	V. R. Stamenkovic, D. Strmcnik, P. P. Lopes and N. M. Markovic, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16, 57 CrossRef Google Scholar
17.	N. Z. Dandan Zhao, Lingzheng Bu, Qi Shao, Xiaoqing Huang, J. Electrochem, 2018, 24, 455 CrossRef Google Scholar
18.	M. Chatti, J. L. Gardiner, M. Fournier, B. Johannessen, T. Williams, T. R. Gengenbach, N. Pai, C. Nguyen, D. R. MacFarlane, R. K. Hocking and A. N. Simonov, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 457 CrossRef Google Scholar
19.	H. N. Nong, L. J. Falling, A. Bergmann, M. Klingenhof, H. P. Tran, C. Spori, R. Mom, J. Timoshenko, G. Zichittella, A. Knop-Gericke, S. Piccinin, J. Perez-Ramirez, B. R. Cuenya, R. Schlogl, P. Strasser, D. Teschner and T. E. Jones, Nature, 2020, 587, 408 CrossRef Google Scholar
20.	M. F. Lagadec and A. Grimaud, Nat. Mater., 2020, 19, 1140 CrossRef Google Scholar
21.	M. Carmo, D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel and D. Stolten, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 4901 CrossRef Google Scholar
22.	M. Blasco-Ahicart, J. Soriano-Lopez, J. J. Carbo, J. M. Poblet and J. R. Galan-Mascaros, Nat. Chem., 2018, 10, 24 CrossRef Google Scholar
23.	H. Jang, W. Jin, G. Nam, Y. Yoo, J. S. Jeon, J. Park, M. G. Kim and J. Cho, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 2167 CrossRef Google Scholar
24.	D. L. Burnett, E. Petrucco, K. M. Rigg, C. M. Zalitis, J. G. Lok, R. J. Kashtiban, M. R. Lees, J. D. B. Sharman and R. I. Walton, Chem. Mater., 2020, 32, 6150 CrossRef Google Scholar
25.	J. S. Kim, B. Kim, H. Kim and K. Kang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1702774 CrossRef Google Scholar
26.	Q. Shi, C. Zhu, D. Du and Y. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48, 3181 CrossRef Google Scholar
27.	Y. Wu, R. Yao, Q. Zhao, J. Li and G. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 439, 135699 CrossRef Google Scholar
28.	F. Zeng, C. Mebrahtu, L. Liao, A. K. Beine and R. Palkovits, J. Energy Chem., 2022, 69, 301 CrossRef Google Scholar
29.	L. Li, P. Wang, Q. Shao and X. Huang, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, 2004243 CrossRef Google Scholar
30.	X.-K. Gu, J. C. A. Camayang, S. Samira and E. Nikolla, J. Catal., 2020, 388, 130 CrossRef Google Scholar
31.	H. Sun, X. Xu, Y. Song, W. Zhou and Z. Shao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2009779 CrossRef Google Scholar
32.	M. Tahir, L. Pan, F. Idrees, X. Zhang, L. Wang, J.-J. Zou and Z. L. Wang, Nano Energy, 2017, 37, 136 CrossRef Google Scholar
33.	Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, Y. Zhu, L. H. Li, Y. Han, Y. Chen, M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16174 CrossRef Google Scholar
34.	Y. Li, Y. Sun, Y. Qin, W. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Luo, H. Yang and S. Guo, Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10, 1903120 CrossRef Google Scholar
35.	X. Du, J. Huang, J. Zhang, Y. Yan, C. Wu, Y. Hu, C. Yan, T. Lei, W. Chen, C. Fan and J. Xiong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 4484 CrossRef Google Scholar
36.	S. Hao, M. Liu, J. Pan, X. Liu, X. Tan, N. Xu, Y. He, L. Lei and X. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 5368 CrossRef Google Scholar
37.	Y. Lin, Z. Tian, L. Zhang, J. Ma, Z. Jiang, B. J. Deibert, R. Ge and L. Chen, Nat. Commun, 2019, 10, 162 CrossRef Google Scholar
38.	J. Su, R. Ge, K. Jiang, Y. Dong, F. Hao, Z. Tian, G. Chen and L. Chen, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1801351 CrossRef Google Scholar
39.	T. Reier, H. N. Nong, D. Teschner, R. Schlögl and P. Strasser, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1601275 CrossRef Google Scholar
40.	J. Rossmeisl, Z. W. Qu, H. Zhu, G. J. Kroes and J. K. Nørskov, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2007, 607, 83 CrossRef Google Scholar
41.	I. C. Man, H. Y. Su, F. Calle-Vallejo, H. A. Hansen, J. I. Martínez, N. G. Inoglu, J. Kitchin, T. F. Jaramillo, J. K. Nørskov and J. Rossmeisl, ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1159 CrossRef Google Scholar
42.	J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir and J. K. Nørskov, Chem. Phys., 2005, 319, 178 CrossRef Google Scholar
43.	Z. P. Shi, X. Wang, J. J. Ge, C. P. Liu and W. Xing, Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 13249 CrossRef Google Scholar
44.	J. Song, C. Wei, Z. F. Huang, C. Liu, L. Zeng, X. Wang and Z. J. Xu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 2196 CrossRef Google Scholar
45.	C. Lin, J.-L. Li, X. Li, S. Yang, W. Luo, Y. Zhang, S.-H. Kim, D.-H. Kim, S. S. Shinde, Y.-F. Li, Z.-P. Liu, Z. Jiang and J.-H. Lee, Nat. Catal., 2021, 4, 1012 CrossRef Google Scholar
46.	S. Divanis, A. M. Frandsen, T. Kutlusoy and J. Rossmeisl, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, 23, 19141 CrossRef Google Scholar
47.	L. G. V. Briquet, M. Sarwar, J. Mugo, G. Jones and F. Calle-Vallejo, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 1261 CrossRef Google Scholar
48.	Y. Lee, J. Suntivich, K. J. May, E. E. Perry and Y. Shao-Horn, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 399 CrossRef Google Scholar
49.	N. B. Halck, V. Petrykin, P. Krtil and J. Rossmeisl, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 13682 CrossRef Google Scholar
50.	R. R. Rao, M. J. Kolb, N. B. Halck, A. F. Pedersen, A. Mehta, H. You, K. A. Stoerzinger, Z. Feng, H. A. Hansen, H. Zhou, L. Giordano, J. Rossmeisl, T. Vegge, I. Chorkendorff, I. E. L. Stephens and Y. Shao-Horn, Energy Environ. Sci, 2017, 10, 2626 CrossRef Google Scholar
51.	B. J. a. A. Damjanovi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1976, 123, 374 CrossRef Google Scholar
52.	J. O. M. B. T. Otagawa, J. Phys. Chem., 1983, 87, 2960 CrossRef Google Scholar
53.	X. Rong, J. Parolin and A. M. Kolpak, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 1153 CrossRef Google Scholar
54.	A. Grimaud, O. Diaz-Morales, B. Han, W. T. Hong, Y. L. Lee, L. Giordano, K. A. Stoerzinger, M. T. M. Koper and Y. Shao-Horn, Nat. Chem., 2017, 9, 457 CrossRef Google Scholar
55.	J. S. Yoo, X. Rong, Y. Liu and A. M. Kolpak, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 4628 CrossRef Google Scholar
56.	Y. Tian, S. Wang, E. Velasco, Y. Yang, L. Cao, L. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Lin, Q. Zhang and L. Chen, iScience, 2020, 23, 100756 CrossRef Google Scholar
57.	K. Macounová, J. Jirkovský, M. V. Makarova, J. Franc and P. Krtil, J. Solid State Electrochem, 2009, 13, 959 CrossRef Google Scholar
58.	R. R. R. Jonathan Hwang, Livia Giordano, Yu Katayama, Yang Yu, Yang Shao-Horn, Science, 2017, 358, 751 CrossRef Google Scholar
59.	M. Okamura, M. Kondo, R. Kuga, Y. Kurashige, T. Yanai, S. Hayami, V. K. Praneeth, M. Yoshida, K. Yoneda, S. Kawata and S. Masaoka, Nature, 2016, 530, 465 CrossRef Google Scholar
60.	Y.-L. Lee, J. Kleis, J. Rossmeisl, Y. Shao-Horn and D. Morgan, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 3966 CrossRef Google Scholar
61.	K. J. May, C. E. Carlton, K. A. Stoerzinger, M. Risch, J. Suntivich, Y.-L. Lee, A. Grimaud and Y. Shao-Horn, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 3264 CrossRef Google Scholar
62.	S. H. Chang, N. Danilovic, K. C. Chang, R. Subbaraman, A. P. Paulikas, D. D. Fong, M. J. Highland, P. M. Baldo, V. R. Stamenkovic, J. W. Freeland, J. A. Eastman and N. M. Markovic, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 4191 CrossRef Google Scholar
63.	S. H. Chang, J. G. Connell, N. Danilovic, R. Subbaraman, K. C. Chang, V. R. Stamenkovic and N. M. Markovic, Faraday Discuss, 2014, 176, 125 CrossRef Google Scholar
64.	K. Wang, Y. Wang, B. Yang, Z. Li, X. Qin, Q. Zhang, L. Lei, M. Qiu, G. Wu and Y. Hou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 2356 CrossRef Google Scholar
65.	M. W.-M. a. J. HEITBAUM, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem, 1987, 237, 251 CrossRef Google Scholar
66.	K. A. Stoerzinger, O. Diaz-Morales, M. Kolb, R. R. Rao, R. Frydendal, L. Qiao, X. R. Wang, N. B. Halck, J. Rossmeisl, H. A. Hansen, T. Vegge, I. E. L. Stephens, M. T. M. Koper and Y. Shao-Horn, ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2, 876 CrossRef Google Scholar
67.	J. Shan, T. Ling, K. Davey, Y. Zheng and S. Z. Qiao, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1900510 CrossRef Google Scholar
68.	F. Calle-Vallejo, M. T. Koper and A. S. Bandarenka, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 5210 CrossRef Google Scholar
69.	T. Reier, Z. Pawolek, S. Cherevko, M. Bruns, T. Jones, D. Teschner, S. Selve, A. Bergmann, H. N. Nong, R. Schlogl, K. J. Mayrhofer and P. Strasser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 13031 CrossRef Google Scholar
70.	J. Feng, F. Lv, W. Zhang, P. Li, K. Wang, C. Yang, B. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Zhou, F. Lin, G. C. Wang and S. Guo, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1703798 CrossRef Google Scholar
71.	S. Chen, H. Huang, P. Jiang, K. Yang, J. Diao, S. Gong, S. Liu, M. Huang, H. Wang and Q. Chen, ACS Catal., 2019, 10, 1152 CrossRef Google Scholar
72.	H. Huang, H. Kim, A. Lee, S. Kim, W.-G. Lim, C.-Y. Park, S. Kim, S.-K. Kim and J. Lee, Nano Energy, 2021, 88, 106276 CrossRef Google Scholar
73.	W. Z. Chunlei Peng, Zhaoxia Li, Zhaoyu Kuang, Guofeng Cheng, Jeffery T. Miller, Shuhui Sun, Hangrong Chen, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 425, 131707 CrossRef Google Scholar
74.	L. An, F. Yang, C. Fu, X. Cai, S. Shen, G. Xia, J. Li, Y. Du, L. Luo and J. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2200131 CrossRef Google Scholar
75.	Y. Wang, T. Zhou, K. Jiang, P. Da, Z. Peng, J. Tang, B. Kong, W.-B. Cai, Z. Yang and G. Zheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2014, 4, 1400696 CrossRef Google Scholar
76.	J. T. Mefford, X. Rong, A. M. Abakumov, W. G. Hardin, S. Dai, A. M. Kolpak, K. P. Johnston and K. J. Stevenson, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 11053 CrossRef Google Scholar
77.	W. Li, H. Zhang, M. Hong, L. Zhang, X. Feng, M. Shi, W. Hu, S. Mu, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 431, 134072 CrossRef Google Scholar
78.	H. Sun and W. Jung, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 15506 CrossRef Google Scholar
79.	Y. Qin, T. Yu, S. Deng, X. Y. Zhou, D. Lin, Q. Zhang, Z. Jin, D. Zhang, Y. B. He, H. J. Qiu, L. He, F. Kang, K. Li and T. Y. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 3784 CrossRef Google Scholar
80.	D. A. Kuznetsov, M. A. Naeem, P. V. Kumar, P. M. Abdala, A. Fedorov and C. R. Muller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 7883 CrossRef Google Scholar
81.	S. Anantharaj and S. Noda, Small, 2020, 16, 1905779 CrossRef Google Scholar
82.	G. Wu, X. Zheng, P. Cui, H. Jiang, X. Wang, Y. Qu, W. Chen, Y. Lin, H. Li, X. Han, Y. Hu, P. Liu, Q. Zhang, J. Ge, Y. Yao, R. Sun, Y. Wu, L. Gu, X. Hong and Y. Li, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 4855 CrossRef Google Scholar
83.	L. Zhang, H. Jang, H. Liu, M. G. Kim, D. Yang, S. Liu, X. Liu and J. Cho, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 18821 CrossRef Google Scholar
84.	X. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Z. Guo, Y. Zhu, H. Chen, F. Li, P. Liu, B. Yu, X. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Chen and M. Liu, Adv. Sci., 2019, 6, 1801898 CrossRef Google Scholar
85.	H. Cheng, N. Yang, G. Liu, Y. Ge, J. Huang, Q. Yun, Y. Du, C. J. Sun, B. Chen, J. Liu and H. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2020, 32, 1902964 CrossRef Google Scholar
86.	G. G. S. Tam D. Nguyen, Zhichuan J. Xu, Electrocatalysis, 2016, 7, 420 CrossRef Google Scholar
87.	C. L. Hongchao Ma, Jianhui Liao, Yi Su, Xingzhong Xue, Wei Xing, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2006, 247, 7 CrossRef Google Scholar
88.	K. Xiao, R.-T. Lin, J.-X. Wei, N. Li, H. Li, T. Ma and Z.-Q. Liu, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 4980 CrossRef Google Scholar
89.	J. Li, C. Zhang, C. Zhang, H. Ma, Y. Yang, Z. Guo, Y. Wang and H. Ma, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 430, 132953 CrossRef Google Scholar
90.	J. Yang, B. Chen, X. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Li, J. Dong, W. Chen, W. Yan, T. Yao, X. Duan, Y. Wu and Y. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 9495 CrossRef Google Scholar
91.	L. Cao, Q. Luo, J. Chen, L. Wang, Y. Lin, H. Wang, X. Liu, X. Shen, W. Zhang, W. Liu, Z. Qi, Z. Jiang, J. Yang and T. Yao, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 4849 CrossRef Google Scholar
92.	S. H. Yancai Yao, W. X. Chen, Z. Q. Huang, W. C. Wei, T. Yao, R. R. Liu, K. T. Zang, X. Q. Wang, G. Wu, W. J. Yuan, T. W. Yuan, B. Q. Zhu, W. Liu, Z. J. Li, D. S. He, Z. G. Xue, Y. Wang, X. S. Zheng, J. C. Dong, C. R. Chang, Y. X. Chen, X. Hong, J. Luo, S. Q. Wei, W. X. Li, P. Strasser, Y. Wu & Y. D. Li, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 304 CrossRef Google Scholar
93.	Y. L. Sourav Laha, Filip Podjaski, Daniel Weber, Viola Duppel, Leslie M. Schoop, Florian Pielnhofer, Christoph Scheurer, Kathrin Müller, Ulrich Starke, Karsten Reuter, and Bettina V. Lotsch, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9, 1803795 CrossRef Google Scholar
94.	L. L. Feng, G. Yu, Y. Wu, G. D. Li, H. Li, Y. Sun, T. Asefa, W. Chen and X. Zou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 14023 CrossRef Google Scholar
95.	T. Reier, M. Oezaslan and P. Strasser, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 1765 CrossRef Google Scholar
96.	J. Y. Kim, J. Choi, H. Y. Kim, E. Hwang, H.-J. Kim, S. H. Ahn and S.-K. Kim, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 359, 227 CrossRef Google Scholar
97.	A. R. Poerwoprajitno, L. Gloag, T. M. Benedetti, S. Cheong, J. Watt, D. L. Huber, J. J. Gooding and R. D. Tilley, Small, 2019, 15, 1804577 CrossRef Google Scholar
98.	H. Cui, H.-X. Liao, Z.-L. Wang, J.-P. Xie, P.-F. Tan, D.-W. Chu and P. Jun, Rare Metals, 2022, 41, 2606 CrossRef Google Scholar
99.	J. Xu, Z. Lian, B. Wei, Y. Li, O. Bondarchuk, N. Zhang, Z. Yu, A. Araujo, I. Amorim, Z. Wang, B. Li and L. Liu, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 3571 CrossRef Google Scholar
100.	J. Xu, J. Li, Z. Lian, A. Araujo, Y. Li, B. Wei, Z. Yu, O. Bondarchuk, I. Amorim, V. Tileli, B. Li and L. Liu, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 3402 CrossRef Google Scholar
101.	Z. L. Zhao, Q. Wang, X. Huang, Q. Feng, S. Gu, Z. Zhang, H. Xu, L. Zeng, M. Gu and H. Li, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 5143 CrossRef Google Scholar
102.	M. R. Joohyuk Park, Gyutae Nam, Minjoon Park, Tae Joo Shin, Suhyeon Park, Min Gyu Kim, Yang Shao-Horn and Jaephil Cho, Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10, 129 CrossRef Google Scholar
103.	X. Miao, L. Zhang, L. Wu, Z. Hu, L. Shi and S. Zhou, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 3809 CrossRef Google Scholar
104.	Q. Feng, J. Zou, Y. Wang, Z. Zhao, M. C. Williams, H. Li and H. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 4520 CrossRef Google Scholar
105.	G. Zhou, P. Wang, B. Hu, X. Shen, C. Liu, W. Tao, P. Huang and L. Liu, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 4106 CrossRef Google Scholar
106.	P. Gayen, S. Saha and V. Ramani, Acc. Chem. Res., 2022, 55, 2191 CrossRef Google Scholar
107.	M. Retuerto, L. Pascual, F. Calle-Vallejo, P. Ferrer, D. Gianolio, A. G. Pereira, A. Garcia, J. Torrero, M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, P. Bencok, M. A. Pena, J. L. G. Fierro and S. Rojas, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 2041 CrossRef Google Scholar
108.	J. Kim, P. C. Shih, Y. Qin, Z. Al-Bardan, C. J. Sun and H. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 13877 CrossRef Google Scholar
109.	M. A. Hubert, A. M. Patel, A. Gallo, Y. Liu, E. Valle, M. Ben-Naim, J. Sanchez, D. Sokaras, R. Sinclair, J. K. Nørskov, L. A. King, M. Bajdich and T. F. Jaramillo, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 12182 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.